Delegate Satisfaction at a Glance
AGen/ACSS/ACSEE2016 Post-Conference Survey Results
- Academic quality
- Networking opportunities
- Conference venue
- Would attend again
- Would recommend the conference
The Asian Conference on Aging & Gerontology (AGen) offers the chance for scholars and practitioners to exchange the latest ideas and approaches, attend workshops and interact with some of the biggest names in the field.
What’s more, this conference, like all IAFOR conferences, is organised in partnership with some of the world’s leading universities and academic associations. These partnerships attest to the excellence of our programme and ensure that the conference offers an exceptional platform through which to disseminate research. Learn more about IAFOR's Global Partners.
All data provided on this page is sourced from AGen/ACSS/ACSEE2016 Post-Conference Survey Data.
We work hard to put together an excellent academic programme of plenary and featured sessions, topical panels, workshops and forums, but the heart of any academic conference is, of course, the parallel sessions during which the majority of delegates present their papers, then engage in discussion and receive feedback from their peers.
The responses indicate that consistent high standards are maintained during this part of the conference. 86% of respondents to the AGen/ACSS/ACSEE2016 feedback survey said they were satisfied with the quality of the parallel sessions, with 21% reporting them to be "very good". 38% responded that they were "good" and 27% stated "fair".
Human interaction is at the source of all value creation, and our academic connections provide us with a community of knowledge. Conferences provide an excellent opportunity for academics to expand the personal and professional networks necessary for a successful career.
Based on feedback received after the AGen/ACSS/ACSEE2016 conference, 96% of respondents said that they were satisfied with the networking opportunities offered by the event, with 28% responding the networking opportunities were "very good", 41% describing them as "good" and 27% saying they were "fair".
94% of respondents said they were satisfied with the 2016 conference venue, Art Center Kobe, which is modern, bright, compact and conducive to networking.
94% of respondents to the AGen/ACSS/ACSEE2016 feedback survey were satisfied with the quality of the conference venue, with 34% responding that it was "very good", 49% responding that it was "good", 11% stating that it was "fair" and 5% stating it was "poor".
Would you come back?
The key question after an event, of course, is whether you would consider returning. For 65% of respondents, the answer is either definitely or probably!
27% of delegates said they would "definitely" attend another AGen/ACSS/ACSEE event, 38% replied that they would "probably" attend again, 27% said they would "maybe" attend again, 6% said it was "unlikely" that they would attend again and 2% said they would "definitely not" attend again.
Would you recommend this conference?
80% of delegates who came to AGen/ACSS/ACSEE in 2016 reported they would recommend the conference to friends and colleagues, with 20% responding that they would not.
(Source: AGen/ACSS/ACSEE2016 Post-Conference Survey Data)